Tl;dr (“Too Long, Didn’t Read”) Version
Why Does This Matter? Why Should I Care?
Doublespeakis extremely powerful for weaponized government agencies.They are able to lie, suppress, and intimidate, with the full power of media fueling their narrative.
FBI Special Agent David Cirilli, under oath in Grand Jury testimony, affirmed that My Big Coin was a cryptocurrency, the government tried to get him to answer differently, and he didn’t.Cirilli also affirmed that My Big Coin Founder & CEO John Roche controlled the My Big Coin social media accounts and email address.
New whistleblower evidence shows that Roche directed and controlled the development of the My Big Coin website, the My Big Coin Exchange website, and the My Big Coin Pay website.
Judge Denise J. Casper, US District Court in Massachusetts, infringed on Randall Crater’s constitutional right to present a defense,violating his 6th amendment rights.
What Should I Do Next?
Read this expose, and review the documents linked to in it.
SHARE IT WITH AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE, SHARE IT ON SOCIAL MEDIA, SHARE IT WITH NEWS OUTLETS.
Please support our work.CLICK HERE TO SUPPORT US.
EDITOR’S NOTE: As we receive relevant additional information, we will publish supplemental pieces as a part of this expose. Part Four of this expose will be published, but as relevant information becomes available we will publish it as quickly as possible.
Doublespeakis powerful.
Edward S. Herman, in his bookBeyond Hypocrisy, describes the principal characteristics of doublespeak:
“What is really important in the world of doublespeak is the ability to lie, whether knowingly or unconsciously, and to get away with it; and the ability to use lies and choose and shape facts selectively, blocking out those that don’t fit an agenda or program.“
Throughout our expose series on theU.S. vs Cratercase, we’ve shown the lengths that government agencies - the #FBI, #DOJ, #SEC, and the #CTFC - will go to in an effort to win at any cost:witness intimidation,suppression of information,lies by omission, andsimply making things up…it’s all fair game.
In this special supplemental edition, we’ll get to knowFBI Special Agent David Cirilli and Judge Denise J. Casperbetter, and why what they’ve said and done proves how deep the rabbit hole goes.
MEET THE PLAYERS, PART TWO
We last encountered Mr. Cirilli inPart Twoof our expose, where he was part of the dynamic duo with Postal InspectorJan Kostka, who were responsible for the information provided in John Roche’s 2020“flip-flop” interviewwhere he stated the following:
Mr. Roche seems to have forgotten his2015 statements to FINRA,where he said:
New information obtained by SHERLOCshows testimony given by Mr. Cirilli to a Grand Jury, where he:
-convenientlydoes notanswer questions;
-is given cover by the counsel questioning him;
-and provides additional evidence that John Roche was in control of My Big Coin.
AN INTERVIEW WITH THE GRAND JURY
On February 26, 2019, David Cirilli appeared in front of a Federal Grand Jury in Boston Massachusetts to answer questions in the Crater case. The full document is linked above, andlinked hereas well.
Crypto… or no?
As we shared inPart Twoof the expose, the government and the courts have struggled with whether or not My Big Coin was a cryptocurrency.
This is very important.
From Part Two:
From theDOJ website:
“…a purported cryptocurrency and virtual payment services company headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada, and offered virtual payment servicesthrough a fraudulent digital currency, “My Big Coins,”which he marketed to investors between 2014 and 2017 using misrepresentations about the nature and value of Coins…”
Hard Stop. Words Matter.
The DOJ and the CFTC make the statement that My Big Coins were a “fraudulent digital currency”, yetSenior Judge Rya W. Zobel of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that My Big Coin was a commodity in 2018. During the trial, the prosecution then attempted to say that it wasn’t a cryptocurrency… and then it was.
It’s important to note the actual definition of the wordcommodity. From Webster’s Dictionary:
Please note definitions 2, 3, and 4 for the sake of this case.
The question:Which one is it -Fraudulent, or a commodity?
During Cirilli’s testimony to the Grand Jury (page 8, lines 10-23 and page 9, lines 1-19), he states that“Effectively, these individuals were selling cryptocurrency that was backed by gold. This was referred to as My Big Coin. These were coins offered by the company to investors.”
Hard Stop.
David Cirilli, under oath, has declared that My Big Coin is a cryptocurrency. It’s impossible for something to be fraudulent and real at the same time… until Cirilli made this statement.
It gets worse.
In the exchange following Cirilli’s statement, Trial AttorneyCaitlin Cottingham, sensing trouble with the statement of fact made by Cirilli, effectively tries to guide the line of questioning about the status of the cryptocurrency, stating that it was allegedly being sold:
Unfortunately for Cottingham, Cirilli didn’t get the message.
Cirilli never makes the statement that My Big Coinwas not a real cryptocurrency.
Instead, he continues through his testimony, providing his definition of what a cryptocurrency and what a virtual currency are.
In contrast to the statement affirmed by Cirilli that“misrepresentations were made to investors and potential investors in My Big Coin,” SHERLOC has shown evidence that...